Update Codecov workflow for new coverage format and action

[hahwul]

Revise the Codecov workflow to utilize the new coverage file format and action for improved reporting.

[gemini-code-assist]

Hello @hahwul, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request updates the Codecov workflow to use the new coverage file format and action. Specifically, it changes the coverage output file extension from .out to .txt and replaces the bash script upload method with the official codecov/codecov-action@v5 GitHub Action. This should provide improved reporting and a more robust integration with Codecov.

Highlights

• Coverage File Format: The pull request updates the coverage file format from coverage.out to coverage.txt in the go test command.
• Codecov Action: The pull request replaces the bash script upload method with the codecov/codecov-action@v5 GitHub Action for uploading coverage reports.

Changelog

• .github/workflows/codecov.yml
  • Updates the coverage file extension from .out to .txt in the go test command (line 41).
  • Replaces the bash script upload with the codecov/codecov-action@v5 GitHub Action (lines 42-45).
  • Adds the CODECOV_TOKEN secret for authentication with Codecov (line 45).

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

---

Did you know?

GitHub Actions was first announced on October 16, 2018, and generally available on November 13, 2019.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

The pull request updates the Codecov workflow to use the new coverage file format and action. This should improve the reporting and integration with Codecov. Overall, the changes look good, but I have a few suggestions for improvement.

Summary of Findings

• Coverage file format: The coverage file format is changed from coverage.out to coverage.txt. Ensure that this change is compatible with the Codecov action and that the action correctly parses the new format.
• Codecov action version: The Codecov action is updated to v5. It's important to verify that this version is stable and compatible with the project's requirements.
• Token usage: The Codecov action uses the CODECOV_TOKEN secret. Ensure that this secret is properly configured in the repository settings.

Merge Readiness

The changes seem straightforward and should improve the Codecov integration. However, it's crucial to verify the compatibility of the new coverage file format and the Codecov action version. I recommend testing the workflow thoroughly before merging. I am unable to approve this pull request, and other reviewers should review and approve this code before merging.