Skip to content

Correct handling for SwitchStatements without a containing Block#10027

Merged
niloc132 merged 1 commit intogwtproject:mainfrom
niloc132:10024-switch-cce-test
Nov 7, 2024
Merged

Correct handling for SwitchStatements without a containing Block#10027
niloc132 merged 1 commit intogwtproject:mainfrom
niloc132:10024-switch-cce-test

Conversation

@niloc132
Copy link
Member

@niloc132 niloc132 commented Nov 2, 2024

Also fixed incorrect generics for related code, spotted while auditing other incomplete typechecks.

Fixes #10024

Also fixed incorrect generics for related code, spotted while auditing
other incomplete typechecks

Fixes gwtproject#10024
@niloc132
Copy link
Member Author

niloc132 commented Nov 2, 2024

@niloc132 niloc132 added this to the 2.13 milestone Nov 2, 2024
@niloc132 niloc132 merged commit 636db82 into gwtproject:main Nov 7, 2024
niloc132 added a commit to niloc132/gwt that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
…project#10027)

Also fixed incorrect generics for related code, spotted while auditing
other incomplete typechecks.

Fixes gwtproject#10024
niloc132 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
)

Also fixed incorrect generics for related code, spotted while auditing
other incomplete typechecks.

Fixes #10024
See #10027
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Using a switch statement together with if- or for-statement without using {} crashes

2 participants