2024 Hud List generated JSON file updates

[dtgreiner]

Please squash merge this PR

Description

Initial run of the 2024 Hud List json generator from the machine readable excel file.

Type of change

• Code clean-up / housekeeping

Checklist before requesting review

• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have run the code that is being changed under ideal conditions, and it doesn't fail
• My code includes comments and/or descriptive variable names to help other engineers understand the intent (or not applicable)
• My code follows the style guidelines of this project (rubocop)
• I have updated the documentation (or not applicable)
• If it's not obvious how to test this change, I have provided testing instructions in this PR or the related issue

[dtgreiner]

This PR is just the base run of the generator without any additional cleanup. I believe the "Unknown" codes are related to the "VoucherTracking" and "HOPWAFinancialAssistance" lists.

[eanders]

Thanks @dtgreiner !
@gigxz let's review this in the next few days (weeks?) and update as appropriate so we don't break anything for FY2024, but make sure we catch any bugs from the first-pass. Once it's good, I think we're all set to merge all the way down.

[gigxz]

Sounds good! Can I push directly to this branch or should I comment suggestions?

@dtgreiner @eanders are you intentionally holding off on running rails code:generate_hud_lists (and rails driver:hmis:generate_graphql_enums and rails driver:hmis:dump_graphql_schema) on this branch?

That is what I'm doing locally so I know what to fix, so it might be easier to see the diff in git. But if you don't want to push that, I will just look locally and leave comments on the JSON file.

Edit: I'm working off another branch. The diff is huge because I pulled in release-115, but the file I'm looking at for comparisons is drivers/hmis/app/graphql/schema.graphql. Ideally this should not have any changes to the graphql schema except changes to the labels where it makes sense, or changes where something was actually missed (I found 2 -- proposed them here #4315 since they are actual bug fixes). It is going to take me a while to go through it.

So far I just made the bare minimum changes to get the schema generating again: e5f462b

[gigxz]

this is incorrect for 151