rm gogen.Tuple/NewTuple

[xushiwei]

No description provided.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @xushiwei, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the debugging experience for ClassDefs operations. It refines how type names are presented in debug logs by removing an unnecessary capitalization step and introduces a new, conditional log point to signal the completion of ClassDefs processing. These changes aim to provide more accurate and informative debug output, aiding in understanding the flow and state of the system during development.

Highlights

• Debug Logging Refinement: The debug logging for type names in codebuild.go has been adjusted to remove the automatic capitalization provided by strings.Title, ensuring type names are logged with their original casing.
• New Debug Instrumentation: A new debug log statement (log.Println("ClassDefsEnd")) has been added to the ClassDefs.End method in type_var_and_const.go, which will only be active when the debugInstr flag is enabled, providing clearer visibility into the completion of ClassDefs operations.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.04%. Comparing base (2dc6aef) to head (6bb8a50).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #565   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.04%   96.04%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines        6727     6727           
=======================================
  Hits         6461     6461           
  Misses        198      198           
  Partials       68       68           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request enhances debugging capabilities by adding a new debug log statement in ClassDefs.End and refactoring an existing one in CodeBuilder.End to remove a deprecated function call. The changes are correct and improve code maintainability. The implementation looks good, and I have no further comments.

[xgopilot]

LGTM - Clean debug instrumentation improvements. Two changes:

1. ✅ Removed deprecated strings.Title() from debug output (codebuild.go:2878)
2. ✅ Added ClassDefsEnd logging to match existing ClassDefsStart pattern

Note: Debug output format will change slightly (e.g., "if" instead of "If"), but this is acceptable as debug output is not part of the stable API and strings.Title has been deprecated since Go 1.18.