Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While using
callInitExpris good for consistency withClassDefs.NewAndInit, the current implementation ofcallInitExprappears to have a potential bug related to double cleanup.If
fnreturns 0 andEndInit(0)doesn't panic (e.g., whenNewAndInitis called with no variable names),callInitExprwill executeEndInit(0), and then its deferred function will callResetInit(). This results in cleanup logic (likecommitStmt) being invoked twice, which can lead to incorrect statement ordering.To fix this,
callInitExprshould be refactored to ensure that eitherEndInitorResetInitis called, but never both in a non-panicking execution path. Here's a suggested implementation that addresses this while maintaining panic safety:This revised logic correctly handles all cases, including panics from
fnorEndInit, and avoids the double-cleanup problem.