documentiong ensures ripgrep#21298
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the clarity of the Gemini CLI's Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds documentation to the ensureRipgrepAvailable function, clarifying the behavior of ripgrep binary selection. The new comment correctly states that the CLI prefers a managed binary over a system-installed one and explains the rationale. The change is purely documentary and introduces no runtime modifications. The PR title contains a typo ('documentiong') and does not adhere to the Conventional Commits standard specified in the repository's style guide; it could be improved to docs(core): document ripgrep selection behavior.
|
CHINO G.F.M.
El vie, 6 de mar de 2026, 12:24 a. m., Gaurav ***@***.***>
escribió:
… Merged #21298 <#21298>
into main.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#21298 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BU6RRMEIAZRGG6JXQJPVUST4PJVI5AVCNFSM6AAAAACWITMD6CVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMRTGMZDEMZXHE2TGOA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***
com>
|
Co-authored-by: Gaurav <39389231+gsquared94@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gaurav <39389231+gsquared94@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gaurav <39389231+gsquared94@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gaurav <39389231+gsquared94@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gaurav <39389231+gsquared94@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary
This PR documents the current ripgrep selection behavior in Gemini CLI.
The CLI intentionally uses a managed ripgrep binary and does not yet prefer a system-installed rg, pending checksum verification and internalization of get-ripgrep.
No runtime behavior is changed.
Related Issues
#11438
How to Validate
Pre-Merge Checklist