fix(core): expand excludeTools with legacy aliases for renamed tools#18498
fix(core): expand excludeTools with legacy aliases for renamed tools#18498SandyTao520 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
|
Hi @SandyTao520, thank you so much for your contribution to Gemini CLI! We really appreciate the time and effort you've put into this. We're making some updates to our contribution process to improve how we track and review changes. Please take a moment to review our recent discussion post: Improving Our Contribution Process & Introducing New Guidelines. Key Update: Starting January 26, 2026, the Gemini CLI project will require all pull requests to be associated with an existing issue. Any pull requests not linked to an issue by that date will be automatically closed. Thank you for your understanding and for being a part of our community! |
Summary of ChangesHello @SandyTao520, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a critical bug where the tool exclusion mechanism did not recognize legacy aliases, leading to unexpected tool availability. The core change involves enhancing the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly fixes an issue where legacy tool aliases were not respected by excludeTools. The changes in ToolRegistry to expand the exclusion list with aliases are logical. I've added one high-severity comment regarding a performance concern due to repeated computations, with a suggestion to implement caching using the existing LruCache dependency to avoid potential latency during tool execution.
|
Size Change: +691 B (0%) Total Size: 23.8 MB ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
Summary
excludeToolsdid not respect legacy tool aliases, so excluding a tool by its old name (e.g.search_file_content) failed to exclude the renamed tool (grep_search).Details
The alias system from #17974 was integrated into
getTool()and the policy engine, but not into theexcludeToolsfiltering inToolRegistry. AddedexpandExcludeToolsWithAliases()that expands each entry in the exclude set viagetToolAliases(), applied in bothgetActiveTools()and theisActiveTool()fallback path.Related Issues
Follows up on #17974 and #18003.
How to Validate
{"tools": {"exclude": ["search_file_content"]}}to.gemini/settings.jsongrep_searchtool should be excludednpx vitest run packages/core/src/tools/tool-registry.test.tsPre-Merge Checklist