Skip to content

Zeeman's Conjecture: Collapsibility of Contractible 2-Polyhedron Products #2168

@franzhusch

Description

@franzhusch

What is the conjecture

Zeeman's Conjecture is a fundamental unsolved problem in piecewise-linear (PL) topology relating two key concepts in combinatorial topology.

Key Definitions:

  • A polyhedron is contractible if its identity map is null-homotopic (can be continuously deformed to a point).
  • A polyhedron is collapsible if it admits a sequence of elementary collapses reducing it to a point, where an elementary collapse removes a pair of simplices, one of which is a maximal face of the other.
  • Collapsibility is a stronger condition than contractibility.

Conjecture Statement:

For every contractible 2-polyhedron $K$, the product $K \times I$ is collapsible, where $I = [0,1]$ is the unit interval.

Equivalently: If $G$ is a 2-dimensional CW complex with trivial homology, then some barycentric subdivision of $G \times I$ is collapsible.

Significance: The conjecture connects collapsibility and contractibility for low-dimensional complexes and has implications for understanding 3-manifolds and their spines. It remains open, though partial results exist (e.g., Cohen proved $K \times I^6$ is collapsible for contractible 2-polyhedra $K$).

(This description may contain subtle errors especially on more complex problems; for exact details, refer to the sources.)

Sources:

Prerequisites needed

Formalizability Rating: 3/5 (0 is best) (as of 2026-02-04)

Building blocks (from Mathlib):

  • TopologicalSpace and contractibility theory
  • SimplicialComplex and basic simplicial topology
  • Homotopy equivalence and fundamental concepts

Missing pieces:

  • Formal definition of elementary collapse and collapsibility for polyhedra in a PL-theoretic framework
  • PL topology infrastructure: polyhedra as objects, subdivision operations, collapse sequences

Rating justification (3/5): Mathlib has contractibility and basic topology, but lacks the specialized PL combinatorial concepts (elementary collapse, collapsibility) which are not foundational but represent significant new theory needed to state the conjecture precisely. The main work is formalizing PL-specific definitions rather than foundational changes.

AMS categories

  • ams-55
  • ams-57
  • ams-54

Choose either option

  • I plan on adding this conjecture to the repository
  • This issue is up for grabs: I would like to see this conjecture added by somebody else

This issue was generated by an AI agent and reviewed by me.

See more information here: link

Feedback on mistakes/hallucinations: link

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions