Skip to content

fix: reap subscriber process expiring existing queues#71

Merged
dhruvjain99 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/reaper-process-expiring-exsting-queue
Apr 1, 2025
Merged

fix: reap subscriber process expiring existing queues#71
dhruvjain99 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/reaper-process-expiring-exsting-queue

Conversation

@VivekPipaliya23

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Proposed Changes

This PR addresses the issue where, if one instance of the broker cluster goes down, the other brokers attempt to reap the subscribers from the unavailable instance. During this time, any subscriber might automatically connect to another broker. Nevertheless, the reap subscriber process will still try to place the client in the offline queue and update its session for expiry. This change will prevent online clients from being marked for session expiry.

Types of Changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to this project?

  • Bugfix
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation (correction or otherwise)
  • Cosmetics (whitespace, styles...)
  • DevOps (Build scripts, pipelines...)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating
the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask on the
mailing list. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are
going to look for before merging your code.

  • I have read the CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md document
  • All tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added necessary documentation (if needed)
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in related repositories
  • I have updated changelog (At the bottom of the release version)
  • I have squashed all my commits into one before merging

Further Comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by
explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you
considered, etc.

@VivekPipaliya23 VivekPipaliya23 self-assigned this Feb 21, 2025
@dhruvjain99 dhruvjain99 merged commit 9f48fff into main Apr 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants