Skip to content

Conversation

@alxndrsn
Copy link
Contributor

@alxndrsn alxndrsn commented Dec 2, 2025

Implemented coincidentally while trying to answer the query at https://github.com/getodk/central/pull/1478/files/30b1cf420e7ea4cd74ed63b4347be6929ab37fef#r2579682481. I was looking for a static analysis tool which might report on paths not covered by existing location directives. No luck there, but this PR came out of it easily.

What has been done to verify that this works as intended?

New test, initially failing, then passing when changes to config are made.

Why is this the best possible solution? Were any other approaches considered?

How does this change affect users? Describe intentional changes to behavior and behavior that could have accidentally been affected by code changes. In other words, what are the regression risks?

No change.

Does this change require updates to documentation? If so, please file an issue here and include the link below.

No.

Before submitting this PR, please make sure you have:

  • branched off and targeted the next branch OR only changed documentation/infrastructure (master is stable and used in production)
  • verified that any code or assets from external sources are properly credited in comments or that everything is internally sourced

@alxndrsn alxndrsn marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2025 07:54
@alxndrsn alxndrsn merged commit 93fda4a into getodk:next Dec 3, 2025
5 checks passed
@alxndrsn alxndrsn deleted the gixy-build branch December 3, 2025 08:39
@alxndrsn alxndrsn mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2025
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants