A Python environment with a current version of imagecodecs produces excessively large files.
For the Truck scene with the ours_q_sh_local_test configuration in jxl_quant_sh compression, we expect ~28.8 MB, which we get with imagecodecs 2023.9.18. Here are the results with a current imagecodecs side by side:
| Filename |
imagecodecs==2023.9.18 |
imagecodecs==2024.9.22 |
| _features_dc.jxl |
1.3 MB |
3.1 MB |
| _features_rest.jxl |
16.7 MB |
90.6 MB |
| _opacity.jxl |
421.7 kB |
2.8 MB |
| _rotation.jxl |
1.5 MB |
7.1 MB |
| _scaling.jxl |
2.6 MB |
12.8 MB |
| _xyz.jxl |
6.2 MB |
12.0 MB |
| Total Size |
28.7 MB |
128.3 MB |
Needs an investigation why there is such a large (4x) regression in file sizes with different imagecodecs versions.
A Python environment with a current version of imagecodecs produces excessively large files.
For the Truck scene with the
ours_q_sh_local_testconfiguration injxl_quant_shcompression, we expect ~28.8 MB, which we get with imagecodecs 2023.9.18. Here are the results with a current imagecodecs side by side:Needs an investigation why there is such a large (4x) regression in file sizes with different imagecodecs versions.