Skip to content

Conversation

@Schamper
Copy link
Member

The exFAT implementation still doesn't actually work but at least we can merge fox-it/dissect.util#71 to clean up dissect.util.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 29, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 18.18182% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.84%. Comparing base (d2d2668) to head (ca667db).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
dissect/target/filesystems/exfat.py 18.18% 9 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1125      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.85%   77.84%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         357      357              
  Lines       32363    32367       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        25195    25196       +1     
- Misses       7168     7171       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 77.84% <18.18%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Schamper Schamper merged commit 93f91ce into main Apr 29, 2025
19 of 24 checks passed
@Schamper Schamper deleted the remove-exfat-UTC branch April 29, 2025 10:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants