You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 22, 2023. It is now read-only.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My original thought was to make this a const field on the class. I wanted to be consistent with Battery plugin, i should maybe look through the test code there.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i agree that passing in a method channel is not needed for testing, but passing it though this way -- creating it on initialization vs having it static, should be equivalent?
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally making const fields is frowned upon. since the const is already canonicalized we are only adding overhead to the class. Furthermore, removing the initialization from the factory lets us cut down the code a bit with ??=:
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
final CookieManager cookieManager = CookieManager();
final bool hasCookies = await cookieManager.clearCookies();
expect(hasCookies, true);
});
Expand All
@@ -378,6 +379,7 @@ void main() {
initialUrl: 'https://flutter.io',
),
);
final CookieManager cookieManager = CookieManager();
final bool hasCookies = await cookieManager.clearCookies();
expect(hasCookies, true);
final bool hasCookiesSecond = await cookieManager.clearCookies();
Expand Down
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This needs a Dartdoc, it should mention that it returns or created the singleton instance.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: not sure if '--' is common in Flutter dartdocs (of if it is grammatically correct), I'd just say: