Skip to content

Conversation

@eli-schwartz
Copy link
Contributor

Partial, Meson-only implementation of #2976 for non-MSVC builds.

Due to the prevalence of private symbol reuse, linking to a shared library is simply utterly unreliable, but we still want to defer to the shared library for installable applications. By linking to both, we can share symbols where possible, and statically link where needed.

This means we no longer need to manually track every file that needs to be extracted and reused.

The flip side is that MSVC completely does not support this, so for MSVC builds we just link to a full static copy even where -Ddefault_library=shared.

As a side benefit, by using library inclusion rather than including extra explicit object files, the zstd program shrinks in size slightly (~4kb).

The poolTests program already linked to libzstd, and later to
libtestcommon with included libzstd objects. So this was redundant.

Minus 4 compile steps.
These need to be explicitly included as we use their private symbols,
but we don't need to recompile them when we can reuse the existing
objects.

Minus 7 compile steps.
…f it

Partial, Meson-only implementation of facebook#2976 for non-MSVC builds.

Due to the prevalence of private symbol reuse, linking to a shared
library is simply utterly unreliable, but we still want to defer to the
shared library for installable applications. By linking to both, we can
share symbols where possible, and statically link where needed.

This means we no longer need to manually track every file that needs to
be extracted and reused.

The flip side is that MSVC completely does not support this, so for MSVC
builds we just link to a full static copy even where
-Ddefault_library=shared.

As a side benefit, by using library inclusion rather than including
extra explicit object files, the zstd program shrinks in size slightly
(~4kb).
@Cyan4973 Cyan4973 merged commit ea763f3 into facebook:dev May 2, 2022
@eli-schwartz eli-schwartz deleted the betterlinkage branch May 2, 2022 17:59
@Cyan4973 Cyan4973 mentioned this pull request Feb 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants