Skip to content

Update jmespath to 1.0.1#234

Closed
pyup-bot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
pyup-update-jmespath-1.0.0-to-1.0.1
Closed

Update jmespath to 1.0.1#234
pyup-bot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
pyup-update-jmespath-1.0.0-to-1.0.1

Conversation

@pyup-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR updates jmespath from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1.

Changelog

1.0.1

=====

* Add support for Python 3.11
(`issue 285 <https://github.com/jmespath/jmespath.py/issues/285>`__)
* Fix boolean correctness for floats
(`issue 281 <https://github.com/jmespath/jmespath.py/issues/281>`__)
* Fix Python 3.9 warning about random sampling used in parser cache.
(`issue 216 <https://github.com/jmespath/jmespath.py/issues/216>`__)
* Fix Python 3.8 warning for type comparisons
(`issue 210 <https://github.com/jmespath/jmespath.py/issues/268>`__)
Links

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@b50b9f3). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #234   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   84.14%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       49           
  Lines           ?      681           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?      573           
  Misses          ?      108           
  Partials        ?        0           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b50b9f3...1d3cd24. Read the comment docs.

@pyup-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Closing this in favor of #2310

@pyup-bot pyup-bot closed this Jan 22, 2026
@fabiolssdev fabiolssdev deleted the pyup-update-jmespath-1.0.0-to-1.0.1 branch January 22, 2026 18:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants