Skip to content

Conversation

@grzegorz-bielski
Copy link
Contributor

In here I noticed that the Lazy computation point in key features is not really correct and could be misleading.

I also updated other key features and tags to better showcase contemporary Scala's strengths.

@github-actions
Copy link

Hello. Thanks for opening a PR on Exercism 🙂

We ask that all changes to Exercism are discussed on our Community Forum before being opened on GitHub. To enforce this, we automatically close all PRs that are submitted. That doesn't mean your PR is rejected but that we want the initial discussion about it to happen on our forum where a wide range of key contributors across the Exercism ecosystem can weigh in.

You can use this link to copy this into a new topic on the forum. If we decide the PR is appropriate, we'll reopen it and continue with it, so please don't delete your local branch.

If you're interested in learning more about this auto-responder, please read this blog post.


Note: If this PR has been pre-approved, please link back to this PR on the forum thread and a maintainer or staff member will reopen it.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Aug 15, 2024
@grzegorz-bielski
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello, @ErikSchierboom.

This is a small follow-up to the recent PR. Please take a look 🙇

@ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom marked this pull request as ready for review August 15, 2024 11:57
@ErikSchierboom
Copy link
Member

It this ready to be merged?

@grzegorz-bielski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ErikSchierboom yes!

@ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom merged commit 9f1f161 into exercism:main Aug 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants