Make the return value of account() optional
#2262
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Suppose I run `block { account(address: "0x...") { balance, code, address }` with a valid but unknown address. I find it clearer to get back null for the account than some default values for each field.
Member
|
Ping @Arachnid |
kshinn
approved these changes
Nov 23, 2019
Contributor
kshinn
left a comment
kshinn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is a reasonable expectation. JSONRPC returns null for not found ids (i.e. getBlockByNumber with a future block). An empty result set seems like a reasonable equivalent.
CarlBeek
added a commit
to CarlBeek/EIPs
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2019
…tore * 'bls_keystore' of github.com:CarlBeek/EIPs: (47 commits) fix link to heading Fix spelling Fix email address Draft EIP: BLS12-381 Deterministic Account Hierarchy (ethereum#2334) Fix some URLs and require 2333 too Add name to metadata title (ethereum#2370) Draft: BLS12-381 Key Generation (ethereum#2333) Automatically merged updates to draft EIP(s) (ethereum#2397) Hard fork proposal to address the Ice age (ethereum#2387) Automatically merged updates to draft EIP(s) 1767 (ethereum#2262) EIP-2021: Payoutable Token (ethereum#2021) EIP-2009: Compliance Service (ethereum#2009) EIP-2019: Fundable Token (ethereum#2019) Use solidity/javascript highlighting in various EIPs (ethereum#2372) EIP-2018: Clearable Token (ethereum#2018) EIP-1996: Holdable token (ethereum#1996) Fix the username of @pizza-r0b in EIP-2309 (ethereum#2389) Clarify that empty accounts also return 0 in EIP-1052 (ethereum#2388) dType Functions Extension - Decentralized Type System for EVM (ethereum#2267) Fix spelling of GitHub [R4R] (ethereum#2369) ...
tkstanczak
pushed a commit
to tkstanczak/EIPs
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2020
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because: - It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s) - The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP - The build is passing
Arachnid
pushed a commit
to Arachnid/EIPs
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2021
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because: - It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s) - The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP - The build is passing
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Suppose I run
block { account(address: "0x...") { balance, code, address }with a valid but unknown address. I find it clearer to get back null for the account than some default values for each field.