Skip to content

Conversation

@Fibonacci747
Copy link
Contributor

The example result in EIP-7749 reused the canonical EIP-712 signature which is invalid for ERC-191 0x00, as the preimage and prefix differ; this caused a misleading, non-reproducible example. This change replaces the example signature with a neutral placeholder and adds explicit byte-level encoding rules for the 0x00 scheme, including how to interpret the validator address and data bytes. It also defines the return format precisely as a 65-byte r||s||v signature and clarifies v semantics without EIP-155 chain id for off-chain signing. These updates ensure the example cannot be mistaken for an EIP-712 signature and make the spec implementable and interoperable.

@github-actions github-actions bot added c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-interface labels Nov 13, 2025
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Nov 13, 2025

File EIPS/eip-7749.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @Patronum-Labs, @YamenMerhi

@eth-bot eth-bot added the a-review Waiting on author to review label Nov 13, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

The commit 691dc60 (as a parent of b103ef9) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Nov 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

a-review Waiting on author to review c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-interface w-ci Waiting on CI to pass

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants