Skip to content

Conversation

@blmalone
Copy link
Contributor

@blmalone blmalone commented Jan 28, 2025

This is a duplicate of this PR #14007. For an unknown reason I could not get CI to pass on the original PR. I copied the code over and it started work. I tried saving the commit history but kept running into the same issues.

This was an external contribition by @ElliotFriedman and @prateek105.
cc:

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 45.33%. Comparing base (b8b6606) to head (802f3d4).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #14021      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    46.86%   45.33%   -1.54%     
===========================================
  Files          974      917      -57     
  Lines        81666    76998    -4668     
  Branches       759      759              
===========================================
- Hits         38275    34906    -3369     
+ Misses       40406    39330    -1076     
+ Partials      2985     2762     -223     
Flag Coverage Δ
cannon-go-tests-32 ?
cannon-go-tests-64 ?
contracts-bedrock-tests 87.73% <ø> (-2.72%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 84 files with indirect coverage changes

@blmalone blmalone changed the title Draft: Testing CI Load Alloc For Superchain ops integration testing Jan 28, 2025
@blmalone blmalone marked this pull request as ready for review January 28, 2025 16:31
@blmalone blmalone requested a review from a team as a code owner January 28, 2025 16:31
@blmalone blmalone requested a review from mbaxter January 28, 2025 16:31
@blmalone blmalone requested review from maurelian and mds1 January 28, 2025 16:31
Copy link
Contributor

@maurelian maurelian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A couple questions, but overall LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@mds1 mds1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM aside from the comment clarifications above

@blmalone blmalone enabled auto-merge January 28, 2025 18:06
@blmalone blmalone added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 28, 2025
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 0ffb64a Jan 28, 2025
44 checks passed
@blmalone blmalone deleted the bm/test-console-fork-live branch January 28, 2025 18:16
Rjected pushed a commit to paradigmxyz/optimism that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
…14021)

* fix: test

* fix: nit checking to see if adding a new env causes the issue.

* fix: unused var

* fix: adding branhing logic

* fix: copying other pr

* fix: clarifications around comments.
QuentinI pushed a commit to EspressoSystems/optimism-espresso-integration that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2025
…14021)

* fix: test

* fix: nit checking to see if adding a new env causes the issue.

* fix: unused var

* fix: adding branhing logic

* fix: copying other pr

* fix: clarifications around comments.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants