Skip to content

Conversation

@ptabor
Copy link
Contributor

@ptabor ptabor commented Mar 24, 2021

Thanks to https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/300869/ its feasible now.

Huge kudos to: @dsnet and @justinsb

ptabor added 2 commits March 24, 2021 20:40
golang-proto runtime can deal with both: gogo & golang generated
protobufs. It does not work vice-versa with protobuf-1.5.1.
@ptabor ptabor force-pushed the 20210323-try-upgrade-proto branch from d85ca9b to be59f98 Compare March 24, 2021 21:07
@ptabor ptabor force-pushed the 20210323-try-upgrade-proto branch from be59f98 to 0dabcb4 Compare March 24, 2021 21:28
Copy link
Contributor

@gyuho gyuho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks x100!

@ptabor ptabor changed the title Update dep: github.com/golang/protobuf v1.3.5 ->  v1.5.1 Update dep: github.com/golang/protobuf v1.3.5 ->  v1.5.1, grpc: 1.32->1.36 Mar 24, 2021
@ptabor ptabor force-pushed the 20210323-try-upgrade-proto branch from 0dabcb4 to d0962f1 Compare March 24, 2021 22:31
@ptabor ptabor merged commit 65d6a1f into etcd-io:master Mar 24, 2021
@ptabor ptabor deleted the 20210323-try-upgrade-proto branch March 24, 2021 22:57
@chaochn47 chaochn47 mentioned this pull request Oct 13, 2023
24 tasks
chaochn47 added a commit to chaochn47/etcd that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants