Skip to content

Conversation

@non-Jedi
Copy link
Contributor

@non-Jedi non-Jedi commented Nov 19, 2019

Recently made a PR to julia-mode to use completion-at-point for latex substitution: JuliaEditorSupport/julia-emacs#82. This PR is the changes necessary for compatibility with that new implementation.

I didn't quite grok how jupyter-completion-at-point worked, so there may be details I'm missing, but from what I can tell, it's just duplicating the behavior of julia-latexsub-completion-at-point. Let me know if I'm missing something.

I'm just making this PR now so that I don't forget to do so later since I'm using this branch locally.

I did not update the README which uses jupyter-indent-line as defined for julia as an example because I didn't know what would be a good example to replace it with. There's also the question of whether jupyter-indent-line is worth maintaining since it was only used for julia.

@non-Jedi
Copy link
Contributor Author

non-Jedi commented Nov 19, 2019

I see now that there's logic to complete argument lists and symbols used as dictionary keys, so this PR is incorrect in what it removes. Will update when I get a chance.

EDIT: Done, I think.

@non-Jedi non-Jedi force-pushed the julia-latexsub-completion branch from 47d4d30 to 9b05f7e Compare November 19, 2019 21:16
@non-Jedi non-Jedi force-pushed the julia-latexsub-completion branch from 9b05f7e to 918d9f0 Compare November 19, 2019 21:17
@MasonProtter
Copy link

Is this PR finished? If so, you may want to change the title.

@non-Jedi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MasonProtter No. It's just a preemptive PR for when/if julia-mode is updated with JuliaEditorSupport/julia-emacs#82, and it isn't working correctly anyways.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants