Update factory image tags to use SHA256 hashes

[akchinSTC]

Signed-off-by: Alan Chin [email protected]

Closes #3074

• Update documentation

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Update factory runtime images to use SHA256 hashes instead of the tag name.
Human readable name still exists in the form of the display_name.

How was this pull request tested?

Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1

   By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:

   (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
       have the right to submit it under the Apache License 2.0; or

   (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
       of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
       license and I have the right under that license to submit that
       work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
       by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
       permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
       in the file; or

   (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
       person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
       it.

   (d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
       are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
       personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
       maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
       this project or the open source license(s) involved.

[shalberd]

The image tests are fine now. There are some Elyra tests that seem to not be ok, but that is unrelated to our changes, I think.

[kevin-bates]

These changes LGTM. I do agree with @shalberd that the description of Image Name should be amended with or name and SHA256-digest for consistency.

[shalberd]

Looking good, now the only integration test failing is https://github.com/elyra-ai/elyra/blob/main/tests/integration/pipeline.ts#L135 complex pipeline test stuff

[shalberd]

These changes LGTM. I do agree with @shalberd that the description of Image Name should be amended with or name and SHA256-digest for consistency.

Yes, I think that short addition is a good idea in terms of being brief and terse.

[shalberd]

LGTM, can be merged, thanks to you two, great.