Skip to content

Conversation

@jo-elimu
Copy link
Member

Issue Number

Purpose

Technical Details

Testing Instructions

Screenshots


Format Checks

Note

Files in PRs are automatically checked for format violations with mvn spotless:check.

If this PR contains files with format violations, run mvn spotless:apply to fix them.

@jo-elimu jo-elimu self-assigned this Jul 30, 2025
@jo-elimu jo-elimu requested a review from a team as a code owner July 30, 2025 07:28
@jo-elimu jo-elimu requested review from AshishBagdane, nya-elimu and tomaszsmy and removed request for a team July 30, 2025 07:28
@jo-elimu jo-elimu linked an issue Jul 30, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes include updating the Maven project version in the dependency tree file and downgrading log statements from INFO to DEBUG level in two methods within a utility class. No other functional, structural, or dependency changes are present.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Maven Version Update
pom-dependency-tree.txt
Updated main project artifact version from 2.6.113-SNAPSHOT to 2.6.114-SNAPSHOT.
Logging Level Adjustment
src/main/java/ai/elimu/util/epub/EPubParagraphExtractionHelper.java
Changed log statements in processParagraphNode and getCleanedUpParagraph from INFO to DEBUG.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Assessment against linked issues

Objective (Issue #) Addressed Explanation
Reduce log output during unit testing by changing log.info to log.debug where appropriate (#1791)

Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes

No out-of-scope changes found.

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch 1791-reduce-log-output

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/main/java/ai/elimu/util/epub/EPubParagraphExtractionHelper.java (1)

351-352: Unconditional System.out.println defeats the noise-reduction goal.

System.out.println("paragraph: " + paragraph); will always print, regardless of log configuration, spamming test output. Replace with a log.debug (or remove entirely).

-        System.out.println("paragraph: " + paragraph);
+        // Use DEBUG level to avoid console noise during tests
+        log.debug("paragraph: {}", paragraph);
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/main/java/ai/elimu/util/epub/EPubParagraphExtractionHelper.java (1)

34-36: Consider downgrading this INFO log as well.

Line 35 still emits at INFO level (extractParagraphsFromChapter). Given the PR goal of reducing unit-test noise, it probably deserves DEBUG like the other statements you just changed.

-        log.info("extractParagraphsFromChapter");
+        log.debug("extractParagraphsFromChapter");
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3708480 and 7664984.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pom-dependency-tree.txt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/ai/elimu/util/epub/EPubParagraphExtractionHelper.java (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
pom-dependency-tree.txt (2)

Learnt from: jo-elimu
PR: elimu-ai/webapp#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-03T08:01:30.217Z
Learning: The elimu-ai/webapp repository has a dependency on ai.elimu:model (version 2.0.97) that provides shared model classes and enums. The Language enum should be imported from ai.elimu.model.v2.enums.Language instead of creating local duplicates.

Learnt from: jo-elimu
PR: #2312
File: src/main/java/ai/elimu/entity/analytics/LetterSoundLearningEvent.java:19-31
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T03:40:02.040Z
Learning: In the elimu.ai webapp project, the database schema file at src/main/resources/META-INF/jpa-schema-export.sql is auto-generated from JPA entity annotations, so manual updates to this file are not needed when adding new entity fields.

🔇 Additional comments (3)
pom-dependency-tree.txt (1)

1-1: Project version bump looks fine.

Only the root artifact version is updated from 2.6.113-SNAPSHOT to 2.6.114-SNAPSHOT; the rest of the tree is untouched, so no dependency-resolution side-effects are expected.

src/main/java/ai/elimu/util/epub/EPubParagraphExtractionHelper.java (2)

238-239: Log level downgrade LGTM.

processParagraphNode now logs at DEBUG, consistent with the PR objective.


304-306: Log level downgrade LGTM.

getCleanedUpParagraph now logs at DEBUG; change is correct and side-effect-free.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 17.13%. Comparing base (f78147c) to head (7664984).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #2320   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     17.13%   17.13%           
  Complexity      461      461           
=========================================
  Files           260      260           
  Lines          7734     7734           
  Branches        900      900           
=========================================
  Hits           1325     1325           
  Misses         6326     6326           
  Partials         83       83           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@jo-elimu jo-elimu merged commit 638f6e8 into main Jul 30, 2025
22 of 24 checks passed
@jo-elimu jo-elimu deleted the 1791-reduce-log-output branch July 30, 2025 07:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reduce log output during unit testing

2 participants