Skip to content

Conversation

@v1v
Copy link
Member

@v1v v1v commented Oct 30, 2025

Release notes

[rn:skip]

What does this PR do?

Fix the github comment syntax caused by #18327

Why is it important/What is the impact to the user?

Otherwise it won't work

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files (and/or docker env variables)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

Author's Checklist

  • [ ]

How to test this PR locally

Related issues

Use cases

Screenshots

Logs

@v1v v1v requested a review from a team October 30, 2025 15:24
@v1v v1v self-assigned this Oct 30, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

Just comment with:

  • run docs-build : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 30, 2025

This pull request does not have a backport label. Could you fix it @v1v? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-8./d is the label to automatically backport to the 8./d branch. /d is the digit.
  • If no backport is necessary, please add the backport-skip label

@v1v v1v added the backport-skip Skip automated backport with mergify label Oct 30, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@kaisecheng kaisecheng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@v1v v1v merged commit be64ebf into elastic:main Oct 30, 2025
12 checks passed
@v1v v1v deleted the fix/pr-bk-bot branch October 30, 2025 15:45
donoghuc pushed a commit to donoghuc/logstash that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2025
donoghuc added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2025
* feat(ci): support exhaustive tests for PRs (code changes or GH comment) (#18327)

* bk: fix regex and add new file (#18382)

* bk(smart exhaustive tests): tune the steps to support GH comments and changesets (#18383)

* chore: remove test file for exhaustive tests and normalise github commands (#18384)

---------

Co-authored-by: Victor Martinez <[email protected]>
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2025
* feat(ci): support exhaustive tests for PRs (code changes or GH comment) (#18327)

* bk: fix regex and add new file (#18382)

* bk(smart exhaustive tests): tune the steps to support GH comments and changesets (#18383)

* chore: remove test file for exhaustive tests and normalise github commands (#18384)

---------

Co-authored-by: Victor Martinez <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 906d5bd)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2025
* feat(ci): support exhaustive tests for PRs (code changes or GH comment) (#18327)

* bk: fix regex and add new file (#18382)

* bk(smart exhaustive tests): tune the steps to support GH comments and changesets (#18383)

* chore: remove test file for exhaustive tests and normalise github commands (#18384)

---------

Co-authored-by: Victor Martinez <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 906d5bd)

# Conflicts:
#	.buildkite/pull-requests.json
donoghuc added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2025
* feat(ci): support exhaustive tests for PRs (code changes or GH comment) (#18327)

* bk: fix regex and add new file (#18382)

* bk(smart exhaustive tests): tune the steps to support GH comments and changesets (#18383)

* chore: remove test file for exhaustive tests and normalise github commands (#18384)

---------


(cherry picked from commit 906d5bd)

Co-authored-by: Cas Donoghue <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Victor Martinez <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport-skip Skip automated backport with mergify

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants