Skip to content

Conversation

@edgarmueller
Copy link
Contributor

Also fixes some minor test-related issues

@edgarmueller edgarmueller added this to the 2.0.12 milestone Nov 8, 2018
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 8, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+1.3%) to 87.873% when pulling d01cdfa on edgarmueller:topic/mui/table-improvements into 928bd09 on eclipsesource:master.

@eneufeld eneufeld self-requested a review November 9, 2018 15:49
});

test('evalEnablement disable invalid case based on schema condition', t => {
test.skip('evalEnablement disable invalid case based on schema condition', t => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed the previous one, but this on is failing.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

did it work before the fix? Is this fixed with the changes in #1148?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@edgarmueller edgarmueller Nov 12, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be fixed, the test had wrong expectations.

@eneufeld
Copy link
Member

The array renderer looks good.
For me the nester array example is quite laggy when I type something into the name field, could you recheck whether it is my machine or whether we have a bug somewhere?

@edgarmueller edgarmueller force-pushed the topic/mui/table-improvements branch from 09511fc to e241d33 Compare November 12, 2018 09:28
@edgarmueller
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't think this is directly related to the array renderers but rather to the change event being fired too often and for me the 'lagginess' also happens in other examples. We should probably debounce change events, but that should be part of a different issue then.

@eneufeld
Copy link
Member

Can you open a new issue for the lagginess?

@edgarmueller
Copy link
Contributor Author

See #1150.

@edgarmueller edgarmueller force-pushed the topic/mui/table-improvements branch from e241d33 to 540c3f9 Compare November 12, 2018 16:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants