Skip to content

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Jun 12, 2018

(created using eb --new-pr)

…on-1.71-intel-2018a-Python-3.6.4.eb, Pysam-0.14.1-intel-2018a-Python-3.6.4.eb, hmmlearn-0.2.0-intel-2018a-Python-3.6.4.eb
@boegel boegel added the update label Jun 12, 2018
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jun 12, 2018

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2646.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.4.1708, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/c74de535bef020200a1586e1c64b7992 for a full test report.

@boegel boegel added this to the 3.6.2 milestone Jun 12, 2018
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jun 12, 2018

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2056.delcatty.os - Linux centos linux 7.4.1708, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/95a83dd8221b81c09ac60e824e2a6ba7 for a full test report.

@boegel boegel requested a review from wpoely86 June 13, 2018 16:08
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jun 21, 2018

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 11 out of 13 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
node3129.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.4.1708, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/b9dba6d0ebf5bca692069c161fb24ef2 for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@damianam damianam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, but as I asked in another PR, did you verify that no other dependencies are downloaded by pip?

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jun 21, 2018

@damianam That's verified automagically by setting (exts_)download_dep_fail = True in these easyconfigs (cfr. easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#1377)

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

Test report by @migueldiascosta
FAILED
Build succeeded for 7 out of 12 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
grc-s05 - Linux centos 6.9, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4640 0 @ 2.40GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/18278a3ad89675c6386528572892fed2 for a full test report.

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

missing XZ dependency in Pysam?

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

Test report by @migueldiascosta
FAILED
Build succeeded for 7 out of 11 (8 easyconfigs in this PR)
grc-s05 - Linux centos 6.9, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4640 0 @ 2.40GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/1af748f606fb577477c0adb94fd59011 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jun 27, 2018

@migueldiascosta Failure with R is due to changed checksums, cfr. #6446, you'll need to re-download those source tarballs...

Not sure about the issue with Pillow though... Does that ring any bells for you?

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

@boegel regarding the issue with Pillow, a google search shows a few things about a binutils 2.28 issue, although that doesn't explain why only I seem to have this problem...

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jun 28, 2018

@migueldiascosta Can you share a full debug log for the failing Pillow? You can obtain it with eb --from-pr 6445 --debug Pillow-5.0.0-intel-2018a-Python-3.6.4.eb .

Also, was LibTIFF/4.0.9-GCCcore-6.4.0 installed with the right binutils version?
Is it an option to try and reinstall that to see if that resolves the issue?

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jun 28, 2018

@migueldiascosta May be related to the fix in #5945, was LibTIFF installed with that configure option (--enable-ld-version-script) included?

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

migueldiascosta commented Jun 28, 2018

@boegel I did try reinstalling LibTIFF, Pillow still failed although with a slightly different error (different duplicate definition)

at least the second install did have the configure option from #5945

I'll get the full log

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

added the LibTIFF log to the gist

@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 3.6.2, next release Jul 6, 2018
@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 3.7.0, next release Sep 22, 2018
@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 3.7.1, next release Oct 10, 2018
@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 3.8.0, 3.8.1 Dec 14, 2018
@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 3.8.1, 3.x Jan 19, 2019
@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor

@boegel Conflicts to be resolved...

@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 3.x, 4.x Feb 20, 2020
@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor

akesandgren commented Oct 16, 2020

I get

WARNING: Use of 1 unknown easyconfig parameters detected in CNVkit-0.9.3-intel-2018a-Python-3.6.4.eb: full_sanity_check

And so is the tests.

@boegel boegel changed the title {bio}[intel/2018a] CNVkit v0.9.3, Biopython v1.71, Pysam v0.14.1, ... {bio}[intel/2018a] CNVkit v0.9.3, Biopython v1.71, hmmlearn 0.2.0 Nov 17, 2020
@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Tests failed in GitHub Actions, see https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/actions/runs/367715320
Output from first failing test suite run:

FAIL: test_changed_files_pull_request (test.easyconfigs.easyconfigs.EasyConfigTest)
Specific checks only done for the (easyconfig) files that were changed in a pull request.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "test/easyconfigs/easyconfigs.py", line 809, in test_changed_files_pull_request
    self.check_python_packages(changed_ecs, added_ecs_filenames)
  File "test/easyconfigs/easyconfigs.py", line 646, in check_python_packages
    self.assertFalse(failing_checks, '\n'.join(failing_checks))
AssertionError: 'use_pip' should be set in Biopython-1.71-intel-2018a-Python-3.6.4.eb
sanity_pip_check should be enabled in CNVkit-0.9.3-intel-2018a-Python-3.6.4.eb
'use_pip' should be set in hmmlearn-0.2.0-intel-2018a-Python-3.6.4.eb

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 10939 tests in 916.701s

FAILED (failures=1)
ERROR: Not all tests were successful.

bleep, bloop, I'm just a bot (boegelbot v20200716.01)
Please talk to my owner @boegel if you notice you me acting stupid),
or submit a pull request to https://github.com/boegel/boegelbot fix the problem.

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

Test report by @migueldiascosta
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
sms - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core Processor (zen), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/d8014dc3dd078b0aed0713163c46c895 for a full test report.

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

@boegel I think my old failing tests can be ignored, I don't seem to be able to reproduce them even in that old CentOS 6 cluster

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Dec 11, 2020

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node2707.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/055720f0bf081b0007c4ca0a5088d96e for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Dec 11, 2020

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3129.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/6d82d485ea495e1d2b9cc1f51568abed for a full test report.

Copy link
Contributor

@akesandgren akesandgren left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor

Test report by @akesandgren
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (3 easyconfigs in total)
b-an04.hpc2n.umu.se - Linux ubuntu 16.04, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.12
See https://gist.github.com/20ee9c162464caae987f1479495c6710 for a full test report.

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor

Going in, thanks @boegel!

@akesandgren akesandgren merged commit 3c57b62 into easybuilders:develop Dec 11, 2020
@boegel boegel deleted the 20180612141944_new_pr_CNVkit093 branch December 11, 2020 15:04
@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.3.3?) Dec 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants