add patch to GCC 11.x + 12.x to fix vectorizer bug

[bartoldeman]

(created using eb --new-pr)

[bartoldeman]

Test report by @bartoldeman
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
build-node.computecanada.ca - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.7.7
See https://gist.github.com/826c539bde1bb905513c13cecc5dcb49 for a full test report.

[boegel]

@bartoldeman Shouldn't this patch also be applied to GCCcore 11.2.0 (and 11.1.0)?

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
CORE_CNT=16

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=16411 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16411 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 9294

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1279729808 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegel]

@bartoldeman Shouldn't this patch also be applied to GCCcore 11.2.0 (and 11.1.0)?

@bartoldeman Current patch GCCcore-11.3.0_fix-vectorizer.patch applies cleanly to GCC 11.1.0 and 11.2.0, so let's add it there too?

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cnx1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/f4d2c097b3ca4bdba930a9bb94b08f51 for a full test report.

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
CORE_CNT=16

[boegel]

@bartoldeman Shouldn't this patch also be applied to GCCcore 11.2.0 (and 11.1.0)?

Fixed this myself in 0f74df6 + e30aeac

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=16411 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16411 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 9295

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1279766782 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
cnx1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/9f7d68f3349e7e11841814b1e01b3251 for a full test report.

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
node3145.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/2354b61dbdd870165b012f720b0a63a3 for a full test report.

[bartoldeman]

Thanks for doing the other GCC's too! LGTM

[boegel]

lgtm

[boegel]

Going in, thanks @bartoldeman!

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2
CORE_CNT=16

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=16411 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16411 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 1702

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1281466193 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/ccaadb9919ec2b7237dd4ea5ac224967 for a full test report.