-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 769
{vis}[foss/2020a] Visit v3.2.2, VTK v8.1.0 w/ Python 3.8.2 #15109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
{vis}[foss/2020a] Visit v3.2.2, VTK v8.1.0 w/ Python 3.8.2 #15109
Conversation
…-foss-2020a-Python-3.8.2.eb and patches: Visit-3.2.2_use_glvnd_libs.patch, Visit-3.2.2_use_EB_osmesa_mesagl.patch, Visit-3.2.2_use_EB_tiff_png_jpeg.patch, VTK-8.1.0_dont_look_for_netcdf_CXX.patch, VTK-8.1.0_fix_char_pointer_in_builtins.patch, VTK-8.1.0_handle_Py38.patch
|
Test report by @akesandgren |
|
@akesandgren: Tests failed in GitHub Actions, see https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/actions/runs/1961949042 bleep, bloop, I'm just a bot (boegelbot v20200716.01) |
|
@akesandgren: Tests failed in GitHub Actions, see https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/actions/runs/1962232447 bleep, bloop, I'm just a bot (boegelbot v20200716.01) |
|
closing this since @akesandgren If |
(created using
eb --new-pr)The reason for this older VTK version is that Visit currently requires VTK <= 8.1.x
At least without patching.