{toolchain} goblf/2020b (incl. LAPACK 3.9.0) #12381

boegel · 2021-03-12T09:57:58Z

(created using eb --new-pr)
requires ~~easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2358~~ (to compile LAPACK 3.9.0 with correct flags)

boegel · 2021-03-12T10:01:16Z

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2358"

boegelbot · 2021-03-12T10:05:07Z

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=12381 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2358" /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_12381 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 16346

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 797379720 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

boegelbot · 2021-03-12T10:07:05Z

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2358
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-1 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/52038f9312795bdf09fa99a552d31b96 for a full test report.

smoors · 2021-03-12T15:51:37Z

Test report by @smoors
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node381.hydra.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/e1051954e9ab16153fc6b59719ecb936 for a full test report.

boegel · 2021-03-12T16:00:16Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3507.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 8.2, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/f79e5a5118d1313b0db144505393023d for a full test report.

…or goblf /2020btoolchain

boegel · 2021-03-15T10:41:41Z

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

boegelbot · 2021-03-15T10:45:06Z

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=12381 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_12381 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 16359

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 799314173 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

boegelbot · 2021-03-15T10:47:43Z

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 1 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-2 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/1c2053368d984479fc27901351bcc85d for a full test report.

easybuild/easyconfigs/s/ScaLAPACK/ScaLAPACK-2.1.0-gompi-2020b-bl.eb

boegel · 2021-03-15T18:13:39Z

Test report by @boegel
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2358
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in total)
node3125.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/d6c8dc246bae9ad9a5835d2ee562a358 for a full test report.

boegel · 2021-03-16T10:18:19Z

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2358"

boegelbot · 2021-03-16T10:20:06Z

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=12381 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2358" /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_12381 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 16382

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 800132809 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

boegelbot · 2021-03-16T10:24:05Z

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2358
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-1 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/b54bcd490b927253bf7b5e0546fe2222 for a full test report.

migueldiascosta · 2021-04-05T07:01:55Z

Test report by @migueldiascosta
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in total)
sms - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core Processor (zen), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/6df00dc5b38c0ddbe159d790dfbada91 for a full test report.

migueldiascosta

lgtm

migueldiascosta · 2021-04-05T07:22:03Z

Going in, thanks @boegel!

akesandgren · 2021-04-06T06:37:54Z

Since LAPACK 3.9.1 is out we should perhaps use that instead...

boegel · 2021-04-06T16:12:13Z

@akesandgren done in #12535

{toolchain} goblf/2020b (incl. LAPACK 3.9.0)

7412c58

boegel added the update label Mar 12, 2021

boegel added this to the next release (4.3.4?) milestone Mar 12, 2021

use GCC toolchain for LAPACK, use ScaLAPACK on top of BLIS + LAPACK f…

87df90c

…or goblf /2020btoolchain

boegel dismissed a stale review via 87df90c March 14, 2021 11:17

filter out different ScaLAPACK variant used as dep for goblf in tests

ce6c502

easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Mar 14, 2021

SebastianAchilles reviewed Mar 15, 2021

View reviewed changes

easybuild/easyconfigs/s/ScaLAPACK/ScaLAPACK-2.1.0-gompi-2020b-bl.eb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

use LAPACK as LAPACK library in ScaLAPACK used in goblf/2020b

785231f

easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Mar 15, 2021

easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Mar 16, 2021

migueldiascosta approved these changes Apr 5, 2021

View reviewed changes

migueldiascosta merged commit 08e5f29 into easybuilders:develop Apr 5, 2021

boegel deleted the 20210312105751_new_pr_HPL23 branch April 5, 2021 10:12

boegel mentioned this pull request Apr 6, 2021

update to LAPACK 3.9.1 for goblf/2020b #12535

Merged

{toolchain} goblf/2020b (incl. LAPACK 3.9.0) #12381

{toolchain} goblf/2020b (incl. LAPACK 3.9.0) #12381

Uh oh!

Conversation

boegel commented Mar 12, 2021 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

boegel commented Mar 12, 2021

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Mar 12, 2021

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Mar 12, 2021

Uh oh!

smoors commented Mar 12, 2021

Uh oh!

boegel commented Mar 12, 2021

Uh oh!

boegel commented Mar 15, 2021

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Mar 15, 2021

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Mar 15, 2021

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

boegel commented Mar 15, 2021

Uh oh!

boegel commented Mar 16, 2021

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Mar 16, 2021

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Mar 16, 2021

Uh oh!

migueldiascosta commented Apr 5, 2021

Uh oh!

migueldiascosta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

migueldiascosta commented Apr 5, 2021

Uh oh!

akesandgren commented Apr 6, 2021

Uh oh!

boegel commented Apr 6, 2021

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants

boegel commented Mar 12, 2021 •

edited

Loading