{geo}[foss/2020b,intel/2020b] WRF v3.9.1.1 #11675

boegel · 2020-11-11T10:47:17Z

(created using eb --new-pr)

…hecksums

Micket

lgtm

Micket · 2020-11-11T23:46:54Z

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

boegelbot · 2020-11-11T23:50:15Z

@Micket: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=11675 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_11675 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 9755

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 725727141 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

Micket · 2020-11-11T23:56:39Z

Test report by @Micket
FAILED
Build succeeded for 4 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
vera-c1 - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/17f17d68dcb73dbc1f0b8878b10a7b90 for a full test report.

ugh, probably some test suite or something and i is problematic on my build node

boegelbot · 2020-11-12T01:58:56Z

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 4 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-1 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/290d98d12180be3920c4ef26fa3ab3b1 for a full test report.

boegel · 2020-11-12T08:26:08Z

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

boegelbot · 2020-11-12T08:30:11Z

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=11675 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_11675 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 9759

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 725923176 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

boegelbot · 2020-11-12T10:41:00Z

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 4 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-2 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/37c17c16a2f4821714fb7983faaf2c97 for a full test report.

boegel · 2020-11-12T10:58:53Z

@Micket No, there's something really wrong...

ranlib  libwrflib.a -ltirpc
ranlib: invalid option -- 'l'
ranlib: invalid option -- 'i'
ranlib: invalid option -- 'r'
ranlib: invalid option -- 'p'
ranlib: invalid option -- 'c'

boegel · 2020-11-12T11:01:22Z

Test report by @Micket
FAILED
Build succeeded for 4 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
vera-c1 - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/17f17d68dcb73dbc1f0b8878b10a7b90 for a full test report.

ugh, probably some test suite or something and i is problematic on my build node

@Micket In your case, it's a different problem:

/bin/bash: /apps/Vera/software/MPI/intel/2020.4.304/impi/2019.9.304/WRF/3.9.1.1-dmpar/WRFV3/compile: /apps/Vera/software/Compiler/GCCcore/10.2.0/tcsh/6.22.02/bin/tcsh: bad interpreter: No such file or directory

Did something remove the tcsh installation while WRF was being installed?

Micket · 2020-11-12T11:02:50Z

It might have ran out of disk space, maybe. I was multitasking and didn't keep track.

boegel · 2020-11-12T12:43:53Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
node3122.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/8151dc19e244c8e6061bc59496e4ea44 for a full test report.

boegel · 2020-11-16T11:14:45Z

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

boegelbot · 2020-11-16T11:15:13Z

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=11675 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_11675 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 9771

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 727913486 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

boegelbot · 2020-11-16T13:26:56Z

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 4 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-2 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/91c154b40dd7e2b9835e72d8d6d8cbd3 for a full test report.

akesandgren · 2021-04-14T07:06:29Z

Please update to tcsh 6.22.03 from #12592 before merging

easybuild/easyconfigs/w/WRF/WRF-3.9.1.1-foss-2020b-dmpar.eb

easybuild/easyconfigs/w/WRF/WRF-3.9.1.1-intel-2020b-dmpar.eb

easybuild/easyconfigs/w/WRF/WRF-3.9.1.1-foss-2020b-dmpar.eb

easybuild/easyconfigs/w/WRF/WRF-3.9.1.1-intel-2020b-dmpar.eb

easybuild/easyconfigs/w/WRF/WRF-3.9.1.1-foss-2020b-dmpar.eb

easybuild/easyconfigs/w/WRF/WRF-3.9.1.1-intel-2020b-dmpar.eb

akesandgren

LGTM

akesandgren · 2021-04-15T05:59:00Z

@boegelbot Please test @ generoso

boegelbot · 2021-04-15T06:00:14Z

@akesandgren: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=11675 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_11675 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 16804

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 820137697 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

boegel · 2021-04-15T10:18:14Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3505.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 8.2, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/eff3eba063f94f94331108e712babf8d for a full test report.

boegelbot · 2021-04-15T11:39:15Z

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-1 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/06a892f76bf0753928308315fa62db65 for a full test report.

akesandgren · 2021-04-15T11:40:16Z

Going in, thanks @boegel!

boegel · 2021-04-15T11:46:29Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3132.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/373cbaff9fe2584ebacd93afa8dba909 for a full test report.

{geo}[foss/2020b,intel/2020b] WRF v3.9.1.1

e6172f7

boegel added the update label Nov 11, 2020

add missing patch for WRF 3.9.1.1 to fix compilation with GCC 10.x

04cadab

boegel added the 2020b issues & PRs related to 2020b label Nov 11, 2020

boegel added this to the 4.3.2 milestone Nov 11, 2020

use correct libtirpc patch in WRF 3.9.1.1 easyconfigs + add missing c…

896d928

…hecksums

Micket previously approved these changes Nov 11, 2020

View reviewed changes

easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Nov 12, 2020

Merge branch 'develop' into 20201111114708_new_pr_WRF3911

353146a

boegel modified the milestones: 4.3.2 (next release), 4.4.0 Dec 8, 2020

boegel modified the milestones: next release (4.3.3?), 4.x Feb 19, 2021

akesandgren requested changes Apr 14, 2021

View reviewed changes

easybuild/easyconfigs/w/WRF/WRF-3.9.1.1-foss-2020b-dmpar.eb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

easybuild/easyconfigs/w/WRF/WRF-3.9.1.1-intel-2020b-dmpar.eb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

akesandgren requested changes Apr 14, 2021

View reviewed changes

easybuild/easyconfigs/w/WRF/WRF-3.9.1.1-foss-2020b-dmpar.eb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

easybuild/easyconfigs/w/WRF/WRF-3.9.1.1-intel-2020b-dmpar.eb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

akesandgren requested changes Apr 14, 2021

View reviewed changes

easybuild/easyconfigs/w/WRF/WRF-3.9.1.1-foss-2020b-dmpar.eb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

easybuild/easyconfigs/w/WRF/WRF-3.9.1.1-intel-2020b-dmpar.eb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

akesandgren mentioned this pull request Apr 14, 2021

{geo}[foss/2020b] WPS v4.2, WRF v4.2.2 #12600

Merged

Merge branch 'develop' into 20201111114708_new_pr_WRF3911

d094a7b

boegel dismissed Micket’s stale review via 170f4f6 April 14, 2021 18:06

bump dependencies for WRF 39.1.1 with 2020b toolchain

46021dd

boegel force-pushed the 20201111114708_new_pr_WRF3911 branch from 170f4f6 to 46021dd Compare April 14, 2021 18:08

akesandgren approved these changes Apr 15, 2021

View reviewed changes

boegel removed the 2020b issues & PRs related to 2020b label Apr 15, 2021

akesandgren merged commit 9be0292 into easybuilders:develop Apr 15, 2021

boegel deleted the 20201111114708_new_pr_WRF3911 branch April 15, 2021 17:58

boegel modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.3.5?) Apr 15, 2021

{geo}[foss/2020b,intel/2020b] WRF v3.9.1.1 #11675

{geo}[foss/2020b,intel/2020b] WRF v3.9.1.1 #11675

Uh oh!

Conversation

boegel commented Nov 11, 2020

Uh oh!

Micket left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Micket commented Nov 11, 2020

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Nov 11, 2020

Uh oh!

Micket commented Nov 11, 2020 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Nov 12, 2020

Uh oh!

boegel commented Nov 12, 2020

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Nov 12, 2020

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Nov 12, 2020

Uh oh!

boegel commented Nov 12, 2020

Uh oh!

boegel commented Nov 12, 2020

Uh oh!

Micket commented Nov 12, 2020

Uh oh!

boegel commented Nov 12, 2020

Uh oh!

boegel commented Nov 16, 2020

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Nov 16, 2020

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Nov 16, 2020

Uh oh!

akesandgren commented Apr 14, 2021 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

akesandgren left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

akesandgren commented Apr 15, 2021

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Apr 15, 2021

Uh oh!

boegel commented Apr 15, 2021

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Apr 15, 2021

Uh oh!

akesandgren commented Apr 15, 2021

Uh oh!

boegel commented Apr 15, 2021

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

Micket commented Nov 11, 2020 •

edited

Loading

akesandgren commented Apr 14, 2021 •

edited

Loading