add alternative checksum for codetools 0.2-16 in R 4.0.0 easyconfig

[boegel]

(created using eb --new-pr)

Yet another pointless in-place source tarball change on CRAN...

$ diff -ru codetools.old codetools
diff -ru codetools.old/DESCRIPTION codetools/DESCRIPTION
--- codetools.old/DESCRIPTION	2018-12-24 13:40:05.000000000 +0100
+++ codetools/DESCRIPTION	2020-10-17 17:26:51.000000000 +0200
@@ -10,4 +10,4 @@
 NeedsCompilation: no
 Packaged: 2018-12-22 14:48:17 UTC; luke
 Repository: CRAN
-Date/Publication: 2018-12-24 12:40:05 UTC
+Date/Publication: 2018-12-24 13:40:09
diff -ru codetools.old/MD5 codetools/MD5
--- codetools.old/MD5	2018-12-24 13:40:05.000000000 +0100
+++ codetools/MD5	2020-10-17 17:26:51.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-e48906bf15c7ce12219499d2ef9a442a *DESCRIPTION
+f1757de2ed4075a4a4ea09f0743cd031 *DESCRIPTION
 d7d4587719d6cbb3083123501ec23dd3 *NAMESPACE
 898067d87a5ce3373b6a5b83c150746c *R/codetools.R
 2af77179b93b37abb2717ba0dacd60a3 *man/checkUsage.Rd

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=11616 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_11616 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 9697

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 722194136 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-1 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/dcb95907ad1419eaf1d55117de5659e9 for a full test report.

[verdurin]

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
nuc.lan - Linux Fedora 32, x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8650U CPU @ 1.90GHz, Python 3.8.6
See https://gist.github.com/95f89010851eedd3c373712de991b685 for a full test report.

[verdurin]

Looks fine.

[verdurin]

Going in, thanks @boegel!