add easyblock for MRtrix

[boegel]

No description provided.

[hpcugentbot]

Easyblocks unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyblocks-pr-builder/1485/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

[hpcugentbot]

Easyblocks unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyblocks-pr-builder/1486/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

[hpcugentbot]

Easyblocks unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyblocks-pr-builder/1487/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

[wpoely86]

lgtm

[boegel]

@wpoely86: doing this fixes this issue for me, based on the info in https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-c-compiler/topic/338378

lib/types.h(107): error: qualified name is not allowed                                                                                                                         
    typedef std::complex<double> cdouble;                                                                                                                                      
...                                                                                                                    
lib/types.h(107): error: expected a ";"                                                                                                                                        
    typedef std::complex<double> cdouble;  

It feels like a workaround for a bug though... Are we doing something wrong with $CPATH somewhere?

[boegel]

problem was caused by having include subdir of icc included in $CPATH

fixed with wpoely86#20 (included in #756)

[hpcugentbot]

Easyblocks unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyblocks-pr-builder/1494/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

[hpcugentbot]

Easyblocks unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyblocks-pr-builder/1495/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

[boegel]

Jenkins: test this please

[boegel]

Jenkins: ok to test

[hpcugentbot]

Easyblocks unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyblocks-pr-builder/1501/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

[boegel]

tested thoroughly with easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#2217 and easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#2218, good to go, thanks for the review @wpoely86!