Skip to content

[release/7.0] Bump 6.0 workload #79085

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
mmitche merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2022
Merged

[release/7.0] Bump 6.0 workload #79085

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion eng/Versions.props
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
<MinorVersion>0</MinorVersion>
<PatchVersion>2</PatchVersion>
<SdkBandVersion>7.0.100</SdkBandVersion>
<PackageVersionNet6>6.0.12</PackageVersionNet6>
<PackageVersionNet6>6.0.13</PackageVersionNet6>
Copy link
Member

@mmitche mmitche Dec 6, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This value should probably be calculated off of the .NET 7 version, rather than manually updated.

Copy link
Member Author

@lewing lewing Dec 6, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it needs to match the sdk downlevel version but we don't get the sdk update.

Copy link
Member

@mmitche mmitche Dec 6, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But since we almost always ship 6 and 7 in the same month., we can calculate '13' off of the 7.0.2 version in msbuild math logic.

Copy link
Member Author

@lewing lewing Dec 6, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, that is definitely better than it getting missed

<PreReleaseVersionLabel>servicing</PreReleaseVersionLabel>
<PreReleaseVersionIteration>
</PreReleaseVersionIteration>
Expand Down