Skip to content

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Backport of #108410 to release/9.0

/cc @artl93

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

Testing

Verified tsa uploads are continuing to happen

Risk

Low. Infra only.

@ghost ghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Oct 1, 2024
@artl93 artl93 added area-Meta Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Oct 1, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-meta
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@artl93 artl93 requested review from ericstj and jeffschwMSFT October 1, 2024 22:03
@artl93 artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Oct 1, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@carlossanlop carlossanlop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, matches the general structure that we used in maintenance-packages and it works.

@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit 40bd96e into release/8.0-staging Oct 1, 2024
177 of 182 checks passed
@carlossanlop carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-108410-to-release/8.0-staging branch October 1, 2024 23:17
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 1, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Meta Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants