NativeAOT has basically the best behavior in these cases - it produces the same warnings
as if the accessor has a direct access to the target member. So if the accessor is correctly annotated
there will be no warnings.
Trimmer is the worst - due to the fact that we mark all methods with a given name, we can't compare
annotations and thus we need to warn on all annotated methods. In addition the accesses are modeled
as reflection accesses so the warning codes are "Reflection" codes. When/If we implement
correct target resolution, we should be able to emulate the behavior of NativeAOT
Analyzer doesn't warn at all in these cases - analyzer simply can't resolve targets (at least sometimes)
and so for now we're not doing anything with UnsafeAccessor in the analyzer.