[Wording only] Clarify wording of verifying local backing document exist case #10752
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
YuliiaKovalova
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2024
JanProvaznik
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2024
This was referenced Jul 28, 2025
This was referenced Aug 4, 2025
This was referenced Aug 15, 2025
Open
This was referenced Oct 15, 2025
Closed
Open
This was referenced Oct 24, 2025
This was referenced Nov 3, 2025
This was referenced Nov 10, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #10695
Context
A confusing assertion wording was used - it might not be immediately helpful when hit.
Changes Made
Fixed the wording.
No actual code changes