-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Change the _maxCalibrationExamples default on CalibratorUtils #5415
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -838,7 +838,9 @@ internal static object Create(IHostEnvironment env, ModelLoadContext ctx, object | |
| internal static class CalibratorUtils | ||
| { | ||
| // maximum number of rows passed to the calibrator. | ||
| private const int _maxCalibrationExamples = 1000000; | ||
| // if 0, we'll actually look through the whole dataset to | ||
| // when training the calibrator | ||
| private const int _maxCalibrationExamples = 0; | ||
|
|
||
| private static bool NeedCalibration(IHostEnvironment env, IChannel ch, ICalibratorTrainer calibrator, | ||
| ITrainer trainer, IPredictor predictor, RoleMappedSchema schema) | ||
|
|
@@ -988,6 +990,10 @@ public static ICalibrator TrainCalibrator(IHostEnvironment env, IChannel ch, ICa | |
| caliTrainer.ProcessTrainingExample(score, label > 0, weight); | ||
|
|
||
| if (maxRows > 0 && ++num >= maxRows) | ||
| // If maxRows was 0, we'll process all of the rows in the dataset | ||
| // Notice that depending of the calibrator, "processing" means | ||
| // only using N random rows of the ones that where processed | ||
|
||
| // to actually train the calibrator. | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Earlier, you had explained to me that if this value is zero, we would look through the whole dataset, but still only use a million rows (randomly selected) for calibration. Is that correct?
Can you please clarify the exact behavior in comments?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is correct for PlattCalibrator, but depending of the calibrator the behavior is different. If this is 0, the only thing that does happen for all the calibrators is that we'll look through all the dataset. I explained this further on the other comment I left, so I don't think it's necessary to clarify it more in here.