Skip to content

Conversation

@vikramdevtron
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Fixes #

Checklist:

  • The title of the PR states what changed and the related issues number (used for the release note).
  • Does this PR requires documentation updates?
  • I've updated documentation as required by this PR.
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have tested it for all user roles.
  • I have added all the required unit/api test cases.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


@gitguardian
Copy link

gitguardian bot commented Oct 24, 2024

️✅ There are no secrets present in this pull request anymore.

If these secrets were true positive and are still valid, we highly recommend you to revoke them.
Once a secret has been leaked into a git repository, you should consider it compromised, even if it was deleted immediately.
Find here more information about risks.


🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.

@vikramdevtron vikramdevtron changed the base branch from main to release-candidate-v0.21.0 October 24, 2024 17:12
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 Security Hotspot
C Security Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)
E Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint

@vikramdevtron vikramdevtron merged commit 6d7f925 into release-candidate-v0.21.0 Oct 24, 2024
8 of 12 checks passed
@vikramdevtron vikramdevtron deleted the common-lib-update branch October 24, 2024 18:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants