Skip to content

Conversation

@AbhishekA1509
Copy link
Member

Description

fix: material prop to WebhookReceivedPayloadModal in BulkCITrigger

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Test A
  • Test B

Checklist:

  • The title of the PR states what changed and the related issues number (used for the release note).
  • Does this PR require documentation updates?
  • I've updated documentation as required by this PR.
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas

@AbhishekA1509 AbhishekA1509 self-assigned this Dec 3, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the PR:Issue-verification-failed PR:Issue-verification-failed label Dec 3, 2024
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 3, 2024

@vivek-devtron vivek-devtron changed the title fix: material prop to WebhookReceivedPayloadModal in BulkCITrigger chore: material prop to WebhookReceivedPayloadModal in BulkCITrigger Dec 3, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added PR:Ready-to-Review PR:Ready-to-Review and removed PR:Issue-verification-failed PR:Issue-verification-failed labels Dec 3, 2024
@vivek-devtron vivek-devtron merged commit 9d11fe5 into release-candidate-v0.24.0 Dec 3, 2024
7 of 9 checks passed
@vivek-devtron vivek-devtron deleted the fix/bulk-webhook branch December 3, 2024 15:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

PR:Ready-to-Review PR:Ready-to-Review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants