new icon: lovable (original, original-wordmark)

[Bulani]

Double check these details before you open a PR

• PR does not match another non-stale PR currently opened
• PR name matches the format new icon: Icon name (versions separated by comma). More details here
• PR's base is the develop branch.
• Your icons are inside a folder as seen here
• SVG matches the standards laid out here
• A new object is added in the devicon.json file at the correct alphabetic position as seen here

This PR closes NONE

Link to prove your SVG is correct and up-to-date.

https://lovable.dev/brand

[Bulani]

@weh Can you tag it with Hacktoberfest?

[weh]

Hi @Bulani, thank you for your contribution. Looks pretty good, but for the font, we need plain or line icons. You can find more information in the wiki article i linked.

Let me know if you need more info or assistance.

[weh]

I guess this icon is also not acceptable. Is this a tool, or the company logo (or both)?
see #2588

@canaleal @Snailedlt what do you think?

[Snailedlt]

@weh I think it's within scope if that's what you're asking.

It's both the name of the company and the tool. It's only used for developing websites, so I don't see why it wouldn't fit

[weh]

It's both the name of the company and the tool. It's only used for developing websites, so I don't see why it wouldn't fit

@Snailedlt: Yes, i wondered if it is acceptable, since OpenAI was declined earlier:

• new icon: openai (original, original-wordmark) #2587
• OpenAI #1755
• Icon request: OpenAI #2413

[Snailedlt]

OpenAI is a company (which is out of scope), while Lovable is a devtool to make websites. It's very useful for fast prototyping.

In other words:

Lovable (the company) is out of scope, but Lovable (the tool) is in scope.
In the same way that Anthropic (the company) is out of scope, but Claude Code (the tool) is in scope.

I hope that clears things up :)

[Bulani]

@weh i fixed the problems