Use upstream Dask for complex sorting operations #336
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
Author
|
Both PRs are merged in now, so this should pass CI whenever the next gpuCI image is built |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Waiting on a Dask release with dask/dask#8345 and for rapidsai/cudf#9789 to get merged in:
Trims down the graph for complex sorts (i.e. multiple non-default ascending / null position booleans) by passing dask-sql's custom sorting function directly to upstream Dask's
sort_values; this shouldn't be too impactful, but saves us an unnecessary call tomap_partitions(M.sort_values, ...)while also cleaning the sorting code up further.