Ignore case for queries in the parser configuration

[jdye64]

This PR modifies the parser configuration to ensure that case does not matter across queries. This closes #315

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #316 (7ab43d9) into main (96524ee) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #316      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.69%   95.70%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          65       65              
  Lines        2854     2864      +10     
  Branches      534      536       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         2731     2741      +10     
+ Misses         75       74       -1     
- Partials       48       49       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
dask_sql/context.py	99.13% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
dask_sql/physical/rel/custom/create_model.py	93.22% <0.00%> (-2.94%)	⬇️
dask_sql/physical/utils/sort.py	90.62% <0.00%> (+7.29%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 96524ee...7ab43d9. Read the comment docs.

[jdye64]

One of the tests timed out. Running again. rerun tests

[ayushdg]

Do you think that this could use the config options in #286 to expose this as something that can be exposed from the python layer to the java layer. Config options doesn't do this today but other parts of the code such as create_model or create_experiment allow this. The only difference in those cases is that they are implemented as a custom plugin. I'm not sure how the options could be piped to an existing plugin

[jdye64]

Do you think that this could use the config options in #286 to expose this as something that can be exposed from the python layer to the java layer. Config options doesn't do this today but other parts of the code such as create_model or create_experiment allow this. The only difference in those cases is that they are implemented as a custom plugin. I'm not sure how the options could be piped to an existing plugin

Sure, I just made the needed changes for that to happen. I just hard coded it to False for now but once #286 merges I will make another update to use that higher ConfigurationContainer abstraction.

[jdye64]

I am following existing logic here using magic strings but think we should likely move all of the configuration keys to mappings.py and add further documentation in a subsequent PR. I am happy to make that PR as well once this one merges. Would prefer to not make that change in this PR since that change effects other codebase areas as well.

[jdye64]

rerun tests

[jdye64]

@charlesbluca not sure what is up with CI but seems like everything passed??

[charlesbluca]

Looks like gpuCI got hung up on the Docker image pull and timed out; there was an issue opened about this recently in Dask: dask/dask#8465

rerun tests

[charlesbluca]

Thanks for the work here @jdye64 😄 just one last comment:

[jdye64]

rerun tests

[charlesbluca]

rerun tests

[charlesbluca]

Thanks for the work here @jdye64! Think the gpuCI failures yesterday may have been related to the AWS outage