Skip to content

Conversation

@charlesbluca
Copy link
Collaborator

This allows us to stop xfailing some of the GPU tests for table creation

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 12, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #251 (cefdfe4) into main (0c05787) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 90.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #251      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.74%   95.69%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          65       65              
  Lines        2841     2855      +14     
  Branches      429      432       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         2720     2732      +12     
  Misses         75       75              
- Partials       46       48       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
dask_sql/input_utils/sqlalchemy.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
dask_sql/input_utils/location.py 93.10% <80.00%> (-6.90%) ⬇️
dask_sql/input_utils/dask.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
dask_sql/input_utils/intake.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
dask_sql/input_utils/pandaslike.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0c05787...cefdfe4. Read the comment docs.


for plugin in [DaskInputPlugin(), PandasLikeInputPlugin()]:
if plugin.is_correct_input(df, table_name, format, **kwargs):
return plugin.to_dc(df, table_name, format, gpu, **kwargs)
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems like the most sensible way to handle published datasets without duplicating code, but I am not sure if there's a cleaner way this could be done.

@charlesbluca charlesbluca merged commit 483ec32 into dask-contrib:main Nov 29, 2021
@charlesbluca charlesbluca deleted the gpu-table-creation branch January 19, 2022 21:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants