Skip to content

Conversation

@joroKr21
Copy link

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #.

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

Are there any user-facing changes?

@joroKr21 joroKr21 requested a review from a team July 11, 2024 13:43
Comment on lines +385 to +387
#[ignore]
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_parameterized_aggregate_udf() -> Result<()> {
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This works on main but not here. Unfortunately something else must be broken too 😢

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is fixed in apache#10473

@joroKr21 joroKr21 force-pushed the udf-eq-hash-v39 branch 3 times, most recently from 1d7feba to bfb57c9 Compare July 12, 2024 06:36
@joroKr21 joroKr21 merged commit 55cdadf into v39 Jul 12, 2024
@joroKr21 joroKr21 deleted the udf-eq-hash-v39 branch July 12, 2024 08:03
avantgardnerio pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
* Add customizable equality and hash functions to UDFs

* Improve equals and hash_value documentation

* Add tests for parameterized UDFs

* CI issues
avantgardnerio pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
* Add customizable equality and hash functions to UDFs

* Improve equals and hash_value documentation

* Add tests for parameterized UDFs

* CI issues
avantgardnerio pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
* Add customizable equality and hash functions to UDFs

* Improve equals and hash_value documentation

* Add tests for parameterized UDFs

* CI issues
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants