Skip to content

Conversation

@tonistiigi
Copy link
Member

Allow arm64/v9 to fall back to arm64/v8

cc @tianon

Allow arm64/v9 to fall back to arm64/v8

Signed-off-by: Tonis Tiigi <[email protected]>
@tianon
Copy link
Member

tianon commented Jun 17, 2024

I agree with this change, but it's also significantly more complicated than this (thanks Arm! 😭) -- see golang/go#60905 (comment) 🙈

See also containerd/containerd#10022 and #8 (which is an attempt to more correctly implement the complexity of arm64 variants that I somehow missed previously 😞)

@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda requested a review from dmcgowan October 20, 2024 21:58
Copy link
Member

@tianon tianon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding an explicit NACK; this needs to be something more complicated (like #8 which I need to get back to reviewing 🙈)

@tonistiigi
Copy link
Member Author

closing this in favor of #8

@tonistiigi tonistiigi closed this Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants