-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
Rebuild python39 0 2 he4191d #55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rebuild python39 0 2 he4191d #55
Conversation
…da-forge-pinning 2020.10.08.20.29.16
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
|
Why is there so much extra stuff in the diff, like changes to the travis file? Also, currently, pybind11 segfaults (rarely on Linux, more often on macOS) with python 3.9.0 (working on solving this soon, PR being made to CPython, hoping for 3.9.1). Next version in a few days should be PyPy and Python 3.9.x friendly. |
That comes from |
|
No, I mean in the |
|
Ah apologies! It's just the contents of pybind/pybind11#2146. It contains a little more than strictly necessary but I guess it was easier to grab with https://github.com/pybind/pybind11/pull/2146.patch when it was originally applied in #46. (I don't know any details about the patch itself, it was already in master when the Python 3.9 migration PR was created.) |
|
I'm experiencing the segmentation fault on macOS as well : conda-forge/python-goosefem-feedstock#7 . I'll guess I'll just have to wait for the new version and retry ? |
|
Assuming that's Python 3.9.0? That will be fixed in Python 3.9.1. The 2.6.0 version of pybind11 will probably also try to trade the segfault for a leak if you are using exactly 3.9.0, see pybind/pybind11#2576. |
Checklist
0(if the version changed)conda-smithy(Use the phrase@conda-forge-admin, please rerenderin a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)Closes #54