Skip to content

Add docstring format style guide #963

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 3, 2025
Merged

Add docstring format style guide #963

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 3, 2025

Conversation

@stevepiercy
Copy link
Member

@stevepiercy stevepiercy commented Nov 2, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@stevepiercy stevepiercy added the doc label Nov 2, 2025
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 2, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 19026047033

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 97.871%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 19025215976: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 8154
Relevant Lines: 8323
💛 - Coveralls

niccokunzmann
niccokunzmann approved these changes Nov 3, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@niccokunzmann niccokunzmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Beautiful!

@niccokunzmann niccokunzmann merged commit 4173a65 into main Nov 3, 2025
21 checks passed
@niccokunzmann niccokunzmann deleted the docstring-format-737 branch November 3, 2025 12:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@niccokunzmann niccokunzmann niccokunzmann approved these changes

@SashankBhamidi SashankBhamidi Awaiting requested review from SashankBhamidi

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

doc

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Which docstring format should we use?

4 participants

@stevepiercy @coveralls @niccokunzmann