Prefix label onboarding form #1072
Conversation
|
@CarolinaCobo is attempting to deploy a commit to the Codú Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
John-Paul-Larkin
left a comment
John-Paul-Larkin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey Carolina,
The surrounding div is now redundant and can be removed. The className on the input was an attempt to override the Catalyst styles, so it can be removed as well.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
CarolinaCobo
force-pushed
the
prefix_label_onboarding_form
branch
from
aba69fd to
c06e92f
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post
Actionable comments posted: 2
🛑 Comments failed to post (2)
app/(app)/courses/[slug]/[id]/_client.tsx (2)
8-12: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider a more user-friendly approach for disabled features.
While using
notFound()when the feature flag is disabled is a valid approach, it might lead to a confusing user experience with a 404 error. Consider implementing a more graceful degradation strategy.You could replace the current implementation with:
if (!flagEnabled) { return <div>This feature is currently unavailable. Please check back later.</div>; }This approach provides a more informative message to users when the feature is disabled.
18-34: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issueReplace mock data with actual video source.
The usage of
mockVideoSrcinapp/(app)/courses/[slug]/[id]/_client.tsxconfirms that mock data is present in the production code.Issues Identified:
Replace the mock data with actual video sources. If the video source is dynamic, consider passing it as a prop to the
Contentcomponent.Ensure that the caption track source is correct:
- src={mockVideoSrc} + src="path/to/actual/captions.vtt"🔗 Analysis chain
Replace mock data with actual video source.
The video player implementation is good, but it's using mock data (
mockVideoSrc) which is not suitable for production code.Replace the mock data with actual video sources. If the video source is dynamic, consider passing it as a prop to the
Contentcomponent.Also, ensure that the caption track source is correct:
- src={mockVideoSrc} + src="path/to/actual/captions.vtt"To verify the usage of mock data, run:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for usage of mock data in the codebase rg --type typescript 'mockVideoSrc'Length of output: 128
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for usage of 'mockVideoSrc' in TypeScript files rg --type typescript 'mockVideoSrc'Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for usage of 'mockVideoSrc' in TypeScript (.ts and .tsx) files rg 'mockVideoSrc' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 300
|
@John-Paul-Larkin free for you to re-review |
NiallJoeMaher
dismissed
John-Paul-Larkin’s stale review
Because it's blocking deployment.
3 participants
✨ Codu Pull Request 💻
Fixes #(issue)
Pull Request details
Any Breaking changes
Associated Screenshots