Drop Python 2 support in cloudpickle #342
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Author
|
@llllllllll OK to drop Python 2? |
5 tasks
ogrisel
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2020
Contributor
ogrisel
left a comment
ogrisel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM but let's wait for others to voice their opinion.
ogrisel
added
the
ci downstream
Contributor
|
All downstream tests still pass. |
Contributor
|
Ok no news in 4 days, let's merge this ;) |
sthagen
added a commit
to sthagen/cloudpipe-cloudpickle
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2020
Drop Python 2 support in cloudpickle (cloudpipe#342)
bavardage
added a commit
to bavardage/cloudpickle-feedstock
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2020
cloudpickle dropped support for python 2.x as of cloudpipe/cloudpickle#342 (i.e. cloudpickle 1.4.0)
5 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on the (lack of) feedback from #338.