Rewrite build-let in cptypes #952
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Internal redesign of build-let to make it easier to use.
mflatt
approved these changes
Jul 7, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Internal redesign of
build-letto make it easier to use.This should not change anything in the final compilation, in the new version the internal function is easier and more intuitive to use.
I also rewrote
define-specialie/bitwisethat usesbuild-let. The new version use another helper function to count the expressions that are not obviouslyfixnum?. This also doesn't change anything in the final result, but the code is shorter and more straightforward.